![]() Test Export 1 (Intel HW acceleration off): 13:40 It's not the best method to fully determine the performance differences but it's all I had time for at the moment. 20 min sequence of 4K interview footage, downscaled to 1080p on export (no effects like Lumetri or anything though). The video I rendered for the test was an approx. However, I happen to have a system with an i7-6700K and one with an i7-7820X - so I ran a few quick tests. That being the case, the i9 processors (and the i7-7820X too) don't meet the hardware requirements for accelerated Intel H.264 encoding. Intel® Core™ i9-7900X X-series Processor (13.75M Cache, up to 4.30 GHz) Product Specifications Intel® Core™ i7-6700K Processor (8M Cache, up to 4.20 GHz) Product Specifications You'll notice that the 6700K has a section called "Processor Graphics", while the i9 chip does not: ![]() Take a look at the specs of the 6700K vs. I thought I'd chime in on this because I've been looking into the same thing since the April update.įirst off, I'm pretty darn certain that the 7900X does not have Intel HD Graphics. so I was/am baffled as to if I can get more performance if I had "Quick Sync" too. All the reading I have done seem to indicate if that Quick sync gets you approx. My export of 4k video is near real time if I'm using basic effects. Or, of there is a h.264 encoder/decoder add on PCI card that can be installed that will blow away both these options? I currently have no issues decoding h.264 4k (3840x2160) or even VP9 content - which is what my dialog was with Intel. Id love to know for sure if quicksync is better than just the 10 core (20 Thread) i9, or if the effect is cumulative like you indicated in your response. So bottom line, I'm very confused by what Intel meant, and why this is such a undocumented feature with little information on how to make sure it will work across your entire set of depended hardware and software. Intel Didn't make mother boards for "PC's" anymore thus why I got a Asus. So looking at the Asus Webpage for this X299 Prime Deluxe board, it doesn't even have a video connector, so not sure how I could get access the 'integrated' video card they are talking about. There response was it was supported on all Skylake CPU's with Integrated Video, which the i9 7900x has. And the dialog on the phone call they refer to was specific around Quicksync. When I originally followed this link on Augthat link showed the support for QuickSync. ![]() The i9 are from the Skylake family and you can also find further information of all i9 processor in the link below: The i9 processor does come with integrated graphics, which means it will support the codecs that your GPU supports. " Based on our phone conversation the codecs for this processors will depend on the GPU. Here is what Intel wrote to me prior to buying the i9 I have been looking at this for days now, and I cant figure out fact from fiction. What's bothersome about this thread is that Adobe-compensated staff kulpreet singh (all lower case because too cool?) marked it as answered, even though he provided totally incorrect information about Xeon processors not making the list (they do) - and his/her answer is only partial and strategically vague, which is Adobe's modus operandi. That said, I think the feature is cumulative: you experience all the benefits of whatever CPU speed you have running, and then as an additional acceleration layer specific to H.264 (and HEVC on Mac OS), Quick Sync further quickens exports. I think your instinct is right, that your high-end i9 would smoke a typical Quick Sync-compatible CPU anyway (certainly mine included, which is a Skylake i7-6700K). Would Quick Sync really be any faster than using the 10/20 cores of the i9?Īnd last question, is there hardware that I can add (PCI card?) that will give me very fast h.264/4k decode and encode? I tried to use google to find some hardware and there is some stuff out there but it looks like a SOC (System On a Chip) products that needs to be turned into usable hardware.Īny suggestions if I wanted to get something to do this faster? I guess I will have to have a conversation with them. They even provided a link to show case this was true. Which is crazy because I have an email from Intel Support from when before I purchased the i9 that said it DID support Quick Sync. Apparently the Intel i9 Processor doesn't support Quick Sync.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |